Find essay

find essay. It is a warrior who prepares himself to confront danger, and who provokes or desires his enemy. Oh, what legs, oh, what legs![220] In these crude forms of art we probably find traces of the influence of European models. All of us can easily also place our hands on books whose only fault is that their language is objectionable–incorrect, silly or vulgar. They are great hunters of ancient Manuscripts, and have in great Veneration any thing, that has scap’d the Teeth of Time and Rats, and if Age have obliterated the Characters, ’tis the more valuable for not being legible. Yet they pass all together without discrimination or selection. The German Ocean, from its being intersected with numerous shoals of sand, some of immense length and breadth, presents a greater variation in the tides and currents than probably any other ocean in the world; and from its exposure to variable and violent winds, renders the navigation extremely dangerous. For the cringing suppliant of the audience chamber, abjectly prostrating himself before a monarch who combines in his own person every legislative and executive function, we have the freeman of the German forests, who sits in council with his chief, who frames the laws which both are bound to respect, and who pays to that chief only the amount of obedience which superior vigor and intellect may be able to enforce. His principles, it must be acknowledged, have a degree of firmness and solidity that we should in vain look for in any other system. The error in his portraiture is not the extravagant hocus-pocus of supposed Indian necromancers by which he is so easily duped, but the premature disclosure of villainy in his temptation of the two apprentices of his brother. I have here tried to put the speculative subtleties of these Hegelian writers, so far as I am able to catch their drift, into intelligible English, and not to caricature them. Pope was also a silent man; and his prose is timid and constrained, and his verse inclining to the monotonous. I will here add once more that this distinction subsists as necessarily and completely between myself and those who most nearly resemble me as between myself and those whose character and properties are the very opposite of mine: because it does not relate to the difference between one being and another, or between one object and another considered absolutely or in themselves, but solely to the difference of the manner and the different degrees of force and certainty, with which, from the imperfect and limited nature of our faculties, the same or different things affect us as they act immediately upon ourselves, or are supposed to act upon others. Taine finds the satirist’s lash laid on heavily in the English school of fiction, even in the writings of Thackeray.[317] Yet judgments as to a writer’s intention based on the prevailing tone of the world he portrays are apt to seem subjective and capricious. Yes; these two cogs do not work smoothly together. Another ugly customer is the _Culcalkin_. The _gros rire_, the cacophonous guffaw, must not be regarded as too vulgar to be admitted here. The history and the authorities which we can cite are certain ancient characters, scarcely understood by many, and explained by some old Indians, sons of the priests of their gods, who alone knew how to read and expound them, and who were believed in and revered as much as the gods themselves, etc.[224]” We have here the positive statement that these hieroglyphic inscriptions were used by the priests for recording their national history, and that by means of them they preserved the recollection of events which took place in a very remote past. If he were custodian of money or funds he would not be let off year after year with the statement that the labor of ascertaining how much remained in his possession was greater than it was worth. In a system which thus waxed so complex, the discretion of the judge at last became the only practical guide, and the legal writers themselves acknowledge the worthlessness of the rules so laboriously constructed when they admit that it is left for his decision to determine whether the indications are sufficient to warrant the infliction of torture.[1714] How absolute was this discretion, and how it was exercised, is manifest when Damhouder declares that in his day bloodthirsty judges were in the habit of employing the severest torture without sufficient proof or investigation, boasting that by its means they could extract a confession of everything.[1715] This fact was no novelty, for the practice had existed, we may say, since the first introduction of torture. Aristotle, who seems in many things original, and who endeavoured to seem to be so in all things, added the principle of privation to those of matter and form, which he had derived from the ancient Pythagorean school. It is “an affection arising from the sudden transformation of a strained (_gespannte_) expectation into nothing”. (12) Don’t buy novels because you see them advertised in the trolley cars. As against Lamb’s plea it seems to me to be a curious case of missing the point. What most of all charms us in our benefactor, is the concord between his sentiments and our own, with regard to what interests us so nearly as the worth of our own character, and the esteem that is due to us. This book is a collection of essays and addresses, arranged in their present order by Mr. The mood of exuberant hilarity favours the slackening of all artificial restrictions. I am sure that none of my children ever did so. In the system (which I have in some degree stated and explained) of receiving and treating them as visitors, even as though they were still rational, and of course observing towards them the same polite and delicate attentions as are practised in well-bred society, the same irresistible effects which precept and example always produce in every sphere, in proportion as they are exercised in sincerity and truth, will be found to be produced also on them; and hence we may easily perceive how it comes to pass that we have so much greater dependence on their attachment, good conduct, fidelity, and honour, than is generally imagined to be possible, and why, consequently, the greater liberty which is given them is seldom or never abused; and, as cause and effect increase each other, it is evident that this system, by exciting and exercising the higher feelings and moral principles of the mind, produces, (as will be seen from the tables I shall hereafter introduce) a much greater proportion of cures than has hitherto been the case. Pain besides, whether of mind or body, is a more pungent sensation than pleasure, and our sympathy with pain, though it falls greatly short of what is naturally felt by the sufferer, is generally a more lively and distinct perception than our sympathy with pleasure, though this last often approaches more nearly, as I shall show immediately, to the natural vivacity of the original passion. In this passage (as is evident if it is taken in its context) there is a combination of positive and negative emotions: an intensely strong attraction toward beauty and an equally intense fascination by the ugliness which is contrasted with it and which destroys it. This mental tone involves a peculiar modification of the conative processes. The defendant protested against this illegal advantage, and the judges decided that the gentleman had forfeited his horse and arms, and that if he desired to continue the combat he must do so in the condition in which he was left by the disarmament—in his shirt without armor or weapons, while his adversary should retain coat of mail, target, and club.[446] The barbarous injustice of the general rule, moreover, was by no means of universal application. The breadth of this current varies from one hundred and sixty to four hundred and fifty geographical miles, and its velocity is from twenty five to seventy nine miles per day, the mean rate being about thirty miles. According to some ancient philosophers, these are the passions which we share in common with the brutes, and which, having no connexion with the characteristical qualities of human nature, are upon that account beneath its dignity. It is interesting, however, to note that which appears in the Arawack, spoken in Guiana. Stevenson—whose predominant inclination to a hopeful and cheerful view of things is clearly shown in his idea that every man carries his ideal hidden away, as the Scotch boys used to carry lanterns in a silent ecstasy—did not go farther than his letters show him to have gone, along the path of philosophic construction. He may believe that there is something occult about it. Father Baeza relates that one of these old sorcerers declared in a dying confession that he had repeatedly changed himself into various wild beasts. No one ever reached a new place by following an old path. We all know it when we see it; but we do not know how to account for it, or to explain in what it consists. Louis H. The man whom we believe to be principally occupied in this sublime contemplation, seldom fails to be the object of our highest veneration; and though his life should be altogether contemplative, we often regard him with a sort of religious respect much superior to that with which we look upon the most active and useful servant of the commonwealth. ii. ] [Illustration: FIG. You are thrown on your back immediately, the conversation is stopped like a country-dance by those who do not know the figure. In the appetite for sex, which frequently, I am disposed to believe almost always, comes a long time before the age of puberty, this is perfectly and distinctly evident. In French faces (and I have seen some that were charming both for the features and expression) there is a varnish of insincerity, a something theatrical or meretricious; but here, every particle is pure to the ‘last recesses of the mind.’ The face (such as it is, and it has a considerable share both of beauty and meaning) is without the smallest alloy of affectation. Comic actors again have their repartees put into their mouths, and must feel considerably at a loss when their cue is taken from them. Moreover, they should at present be such as will help the beginner; for a very large proportion of our musical readers are beginners although they may be in the anomalous position of the reader who knows and appreciates his subject matter very thoroughly, while he can read about it only hesitatingly and haltingly. Arnold is not to be blamed: he wasted his strength, as men of superior ability sometimes do, because he saw something to be done and no one else to do it. A good sort of woman is a character more rare than any of these, but it is equally durable. It is in this sense that it is better to be born lucky than rich. The connections between these movements of fashion and the spirit of laughter are numerous and pretty obvious. After all this Encouragement, I suppose, I shall not be thought vain, if, as I pretend not to the applause, so I fear not the contempt of the world: Yet I presume not so far upon the Merits of what I have written, as to make my Name publick with it. When Innocent heard of this he promptly had the bishop find essay deprived of his see and a successor elected; his decision in this case was carried into the canon law as a precedent to be followed.[1340] In 1210, moreover, when Bishop Henry of Strassburg was vigorously persecuting heresy and convicting heretics by the ordeal, one of them named Reinhold hurried to Rome and returned with a letter from Innocent forbidding it for the future; ordeals might be adjudged, he said, by the secular tribunals, but they were not admissible in ecclesiastical judgments.[1341] Still more effective was his action when, under his impulsion, the Fourth Council of Lateran, in 1215, formally forbade the employment of any ecclesiastical ceremonies in such trials.[1342] As the moral influence of the ordeal depended entirely upon its religious associations, a strict observance of this canon must speedily have swept the whole system into oblivion. One feature was very striking; he possessed considerable powers of imitation, in the exercise of which he took great delight, and in pouring forth his contempt against others, he did it with the attitude and voice of Kemble; it was almost impossible not to feel the force of his manner, and against myself he was particularly severe, and his poignant expressions of contempt and indignity were most provoking and overwhelming. The natural motion of the Earth, as was evident in all its parts, was downwards, in a straight line to the centre; as that of fire and air was upwards, in a straight line from the centre. What character is so detestable as that of one who takes pleasure to sow dissention among friends, and to turn their most tender love into mortal hatred? I am encouraged to maintain this by the recent example of the erudite Dr. Here is Spenser (_Faery Queen_, I. For this a greater degree of quickness or slowness of parts, education, habit, temper, turn of mind, and a variety of collateral and predisposing causes are necessary to account. Genius knows no rules. When the public ear came to be so refined as to reject, in all serious Poetry, the unmeaning words altogether, there would still be a liberty assumed of altering and corrupting, upon many occasions, the pronunciation of the meaning ones, for the sake of accommodating them to the measure. Are you not unjust when, to save him from being killed, you do worse than kill him?”[1847] In 1624, the learned Johann Grafe, in his _Tribunal Reformatum_, argued forcibly in favor of its abolition, having had, it is said, practical experience of its horrors during his persecution for Arminianism by the Calvinists of Holland, and his book attracted sufficient attention to be repeatedly reprinted.[1848] Friedrich Keller, in 1657, at the University of Strassburg, presented a well-reasoned thesis urging its disuse, which was reprinted in 1688, although the title which he prefixed to it shows that he scarce dared to assume the responsibility for its unpopular doctrines.[1849] When the French Ordonnance of 1670 was in preparation, various magistrates of the highest character and largest experience gave it as their fixed opinion that torture was useless, that it rarely succeeded in eliciting the truth from the accused, and that it ought to be abolished.[1850] Towards the close of the century, various writers took up the question. _te_, “inanimate semi-pronoun,” object, 3d person. Santeuil, in judging of _his_ own works, compared them, I suppose, chiefly to those of the other Latin poets of his own time, to the great part of whom he was certainly very far from being inferior. No one can do good work who is ill-housed, underfed, improperly clothed or overworked. If, in any particular qualification, they happen to be superior to him (for who is so perfect as not to have many superiors in many different qualifications?), far from envying their superiority, he, who knows how difficult it is to excel, esteems and honours their excellence, and never fails to bestow upon it the full measure of applause {221} which it deserves. Some advocated the regular punishment of his crime, others demanded for him an extraordinary penalty; some, again, were in favor of incarcerating him;[1760] others assumed that he should be tortured a third time, when a confession, followed as before by a recantation, released him from further torment, for the admirable reason that nature and justice alike abhorred infinity.[1761] This was too metaphysical for some jurists, who referred the whole question to the discretion of the judge, with power to prolong the series of alternate confession and retraction indefinitely, acting doubtless on the theory that most prisoners were like the scamp spoken of by Ippolito dei Marsigli, who, after repeated tortures and revocations, when asked by the judge why he retracted his confession so often, replied that he would rather be tortured a thousand times in the arms than once in the neck, for he could easily find a doctor to set his arm but never one to set his neck.[1762] The magistrates in some places were in the habit of imprisoning or banishing such persons, thus punishing them without conviction, and inflicting a penalty unsuited to the crime of which they were accused.[1763] Others solved the knotty problem by judiciously advising that in the uncertainty of doubt as to his guilt, the prisoner should be soundly scourged and turned loose, after taking an oath not to bring an action for false imprisonment against his tormentors;[1764] but, according to some authorities, this kind of oath, or _urpheda_ as it was called, was of no legal value.[1765] Towards the end of the torture system, however, the more humane though not very logical doctrine prevailed in Germany that a retraction absolved the accused, unless new and different evidence was brought forward, and this had to be stronger and clearer than before, for the presumption of innocence was now with the accused, the torture having purged him of former suspicion.[1766] This necessity of repeating a confession after torture gave rise to another question which caused considerable difference of opinion among doctors, namely, whether witnesses who were tortured had to confirm their evidence subsequently, and whether they, in case of retraction or the presentation of fresh evidence, could be tortured repeatedly. The recreation comes in from the fact that these ideas temporarily distract the attention from other ideas connected with daily work and worry, and that they ease the brain in the same way that a strained muscle may be eased by gentle exercise. (10) Don’t buy books of which you are not in immediate need, when you are morally certain that copies in good condition will be thrown on the markets as remainders at one-quarter the original list price. But we are mostly in the light. When these arrived, the librarian discovered that the announcement of the free lecture was on the same folder with advertisements of a pay course. They attack the weak and spare the strong, to indulge their officiousness and add to their self-importance. In morals, the cultivation of a _moral sense_ is not the last thing to be attended to—nay, it is the first. It has been evident that wide regions within the municipality were not reached by the library’s activities; hence the establishment of branches–practically classification on a regional or territorial basis. When they are unfortunate, however, things change their colours and their names. Fear and anger, together with some other passions which are mixed or connected with them, constitute the first class. Romantic drama tended, accordingly, toward what is sometimes called the “typical,” but which is not the truly typical; for the _typical_ figure in a drama is always particularized—an individual. ‘Books, dreams are each a world, and books, we know, Are a substantial world, both pure and good; Round which, with tendrils strong as flesh and blood, Our pastime and our happiness may grow.’ Let me then conjure the gentle reader, find essay who has ever felt an attachment to books, not hastily to divorce them from their authors. The amiableness of the character exasperates their sense of the atrocity of the injury. It dooms this person to a comparative solitude in the vocal expression of a feeling which is primarily social and communicative. This disposition of mind, however, though it may sometimes be attended with imperfections, is incompatible with any thing that is grossly criminal, and is the happiest foundation upon which the superstructure of perfect virtue can be built. It needs but little study to see that they are both strongly colored by the views which the respective translators entertained of the purpose of the original. It is the same case with what you call the evils of human life. I am not sure that I do not prefer a thorough and bigoted partisanship to this neutrality of ignorance. We soon learn from experience, indeed, that the sensation is frequently excited by bodies at a considerable distance from us; often at a much greater distance, than those ever are which excite the sensation of Smelling. The _Conseil_ of Pierre de Fontaines, which was probably written about the year 1260, affords the same negative evidence in its full instructions for all the legal proceedings then in use. So far as this is true, chance or “luck” has ceased to act and we must look for the cause. It flows from the bounty of Bacchus. in this way, many things have been called symptoms, which have been, in fact, indications of improper treatment. Habit can be nothing but the impulsive force of certain physical impressions surviving in their ideas, and producing the same effects as the original impressions themselves. What he does do is to place them conspicuously in the most frequented spot in his library. The spying out of amusing inconsequences in a man’s various utterances is the work of an expert. The Guarani of the Rio de la Plata underlies dialects which were current as far north as Florida. In such cases the laughter seems like an attempt to get rid of the element of risk. The champion of the Gothic ritual was victorious, and tradition adds that a second trial was made by the ordeal of fire; a missal of each kind was thrown into the flames, and the national liturgy emerged triumphantly unscathed.[369] Nearly contemporary with this was the celebrated case of Otho, Duke of Bavaria, perhaps the most noteworthy example of a judicial appeal to the sword. p. It is agreed among those who have most carefully studied the subject that there is but one path by which the human mind could have originally proceeded from picture-writing or thought-writing to phonetic or sound-writing. We stand by, as it were, to see the work done, insist upon a greater degree of neatness and accuracy, and exercise a sort of petty, jealous jurisdiction over each particular. There cannot be a greater mistake than to suppose that singers dislike to be encored. What are the particulars in which the library must or should be different? If you look for it in Shelley or Beddoes, both of whom in very different ways recaptured something of the Elizabethan inspiration, you will not find it, though you may find other qualities instead. When the _raffine_ of the times of Henri Quatre, or the modern fire-eater, has wiped out some imaginary stain in the blood of his antagonist, the duel thus fought, though bearing a somewhat closer analogy to the judicial find essay combat, is not derived from it, but from the right of private vengeance which was common to all the barbarian tribes, and from the cognate right of private warfare which was the exclusive privilege of the gentry during the feudal period.[288] The established euphuistic formula of demanding “the satisfaction of a gentleman,” thus designates both the object of the custom and find essay its origin. The comparison might be instituted with a slight shade of difference between self-love, the love of a relative or friend, of a neighbour, and of an entire stranger.